From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 2f1aeab9fca1a5f583be1add175d1ee95c213cfa ]
When attempting to exclusive open a device which has no exclusive open
permission, such as a physical device associated with the flakey dm
device, the open operation will fail, resulting in a mount failure.
In this particular scenario, we erroneously return -EINVAL instead of the
correct error code provided by the bdev_open_by_path() function, which is
-EBUSY.
Fix this, by returning error code from the bdev_open_by_path() function.
With this correction, the mount error message will align with that of
ext4 and xfs.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 722a1dde75636..0bf08672caaa2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1224,23 +1224,30 @@ static int open_fs_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
struct btrfs_device *device;
struct btrfs_device *latest_dev = NULL;
struct btrfs_device *tmp_device;
+ int ret = 0;
list_for_each_entry_safe(device, tmp_device, &fs_devices->devices,
dev_list) {
- int ret;
+ int ret2;
- ret = btrfs_open_one_device(fs_devices, device, flags, holder);
- if (ret == 0 &&
+ ret2 = btrfs_open_one_device(fs_devices, device, flags, holder);
+ if (ret2 == 0 &&
(!latest_dev || device->generation > latest_dev->generation)) {
latest_dev = device;
- } else if (ret == -ENODATA) {
+ } else if (ret2 == -ENODATA) {
fs_devices->num_devices--;
list_del(&device->dev_list);
btrfs_free_device(device);
}
+ if (ret == 0 && ret2 != 0)
+ ret = ret2;
}
- if (fs_devices->open_devices == 0)
+
+ if (fs_devices->open_devices == 0) {
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
return -EINVAL;
+ }
fs_devices->opened = 1;
fs_devices->latest_dev = latest_dev;
--
2.43.0
