6.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit 92b47c3b8b242a1f1b73d5c1181d5b678ac1382b upstream. Declaring a struct and immediately zeroing it with memset() seems a bit silly to me. Just zero initialize the struct when declaring it. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231124082735.25470-2-ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c @@ -4466,12 +4466,10 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915 struct intel_crtc *crtc, const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state) { - struct intel_dpll_hw_state dpll_hw_state; + struct intel_dpll_hw_state dpll_hw_state = {}; u8 pipe_mask; bool active; - memset(&dpll_hw_state, 0, sizeof(dpll_hw_state)); - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%s\n", pll->info->name); active = intel_dpll_get_hw_state(i915, pll, &dpll_hw_state);
