This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled deal with deadlock in d_walk() to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: deal-with-deadlock-in-d_walk.patch and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From ca5358ef75fc69fee5322a38a340f5739d997c10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:31:10 -0400 Subject: deal with deadlock in d_walk() From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit ca5358ef75fc69fee5322a38a340f5739d997c10 upstream. ... by not hitting rename_retry for reasons other than rename having happened. In other words, do _not_ restart when finding that between unlocking the child and locking the parent the former got into __dentry_kill(). Skip the killed siblings instead... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/dcache.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) --- a/fs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/dcache.c @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static void __dentry_kill(struct dentry } /* if it was on the hash then remove it */ __d_drop(dentry); - list_del(&dentry->d_child); + __list_del_entry(&dentry->d_child); /* * Inform d_walk() that we are no longer attached to the * dentry tree @@ -1082,33 +1082,31 @@ resume: /* * All done at this level ... ascend and resume the search. */ + rcu_read_lock(); +ascend: if (this_parent != parent) { struct dentry *child = this_parent; this_parent = child->d_parent; - rcu_read_lock(); spin_unlock(&child->d_lock); spin_lock(&this_parent->d_lock); - /* - * might go back up the wrong parent if we have had a rename - * or deletion - */ - if (this_parent != child->d_parent || - (child->d_flags & DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED) || - need_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq)) { - spin_unlock(&this_parent->d_lock); - rcu_read_unlock(); + /* might go back up the wrong parent if we have had a rename. */ + if (need_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq)) goto rename_retry; + next = child->d_child.next; + while (unlikely(child->d_flags & DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED)) { + if (next == &this_parent->d_subdirs) + goto ascend; + child = list_entry(next, struct dentry, d_child); + next = next->next; } rcu_read_unlock(); - next = child->d_child.next; goto resume; } - if (need_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq)) { - spin_unlock(&this_parent->d_lock); + if (need_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq)) goto rename_retry; - } + rcu_read_unlock(); if (finish) finish(data); @@ -1118,6 +1116,9 @@ out_unlock: return; rename_retry: + spin_unlock(&this_parent->d_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); + BUG_ON(seq & 1); if (!retry) return; seq = 1; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-3.18/move-d_rcu-from-overlapping-d_child-to-overlapping-d_alias.patch queue-3.18/deal-with-deadlock-in-d_walk.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html