Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Remove unnecessary var destroy in onmax_destroy()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 05:42:33PM +0800, George Guo wrote:
> From: George Guo <guodongtai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The onmax_destroy() destroyed the onmax var, casusing a double-free error
> flagged by KASAN.
> 
> This is tested via "./ftracetest test.d/trigger/inter-event/
> trigger-onmatch-onmax-action-hist.tc".
> 
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in destroy_hist_field+0x1c2/0x200
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800a4ad100 by task ftracetest/4731
> 
> CPU: 0 PID: 4731 Comm: ftracetest Kdump: loaded Tainted: GE 4.19.90-89 #77
> Source Version: Unknown
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0
> Call Trace:
>  dump_stack+0xcb/0x10b
>  print_address_description.cold+0x54/0x249
>  kasan_report_error.cold+0x63/0xab
>  ? destroy_hist_field+0x1c2/0x200
>  ? hist_trigger_elt_data_alloc+0x5a0/0x5a0
>  __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x8d/0xa0
>  ? destroy_hist_field+0x1c2/0x200
>  destroy_hist_field+0x1c2/0x200
>  onmax_destroy+0x72/0x1e0
>  ? hist_trigger_elt_data_alloc+0x5a0/0x5a0
>  destroy_hist_data+0x236/0xa40
>  event_hist_trigger_free+0x212/0x2f0
>  ? update_cond_flag+0x128/0x170
>  ? event_hist_trigger_func+0x2880/0x2880
>  hist_unregister_trigger+0x2f2/0x4f0
>  event_hist_trigger_func+0x168c/0x2880
>  ? tracing_map_cmp_u64+0xa0/0xa0
>  ? onmatch_create.constprop.0+0xf50/0xf50
>  ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
>  event_trigger_write+0x2f4/0x490
>  ? trigger_start+0x180/0x180
>  ? __fget_light+0x369/0x5d0
>  ? count_memcg_event_mm+0x104/0x2b0
>  ? trigger_start+0x180/0x180
>  __vfs_write+0x81/0x100
>  vfs_write+0x1e1/0x540
>  ksys_write+0x12a/0x290
>  ? __ia32_sys_read+0xb0/0xb0
>  ? __close_fd+0x1d3/0x280
>  do_syscall_64+0xe3/0x2d0
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x5c/0xc1
> RIP: 0033:0x7fd7f4c44e04
> Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 
> 48 8d 05 39 34 0c 00 8b 00 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 
> f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 41 54 55 49 89 d4 53 48 89 f5
> RSP: 002b:00007fff10370df8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000010f RCX: 00007fd7f4c44e04
> RDX: 000000000000010f RSI: 000055fa765df650 RDI: 0000000000000001
> RBP: 000055fa765df650 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fd7f4d035c0
> R13: 000000000000010f R14: 00007fd7f4d037c0 R15: 000000000000010f
> ==================================================================
> 
> So remove the onmax_destroy() destroy_hist_field() call for that var.
> 
> Fixes: 50450603ec9c("tracing: Add 'onmax' hist trigger action support")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> index 7dcb96305e56..58b8a2575b8c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ struct action_data {
>  			char			*fn_name;
>  			unsigned int		max_var_ref_idx;
>  			struct hist_field	*max_var;
> -			struct hist_field	*var;
>  		} onmax;
>  	};
>  };
> @@ -3489,7 +3488,6 @@ static void onmax_destroy(struct action_data *data)
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
>  	destroy_hist_field(data->onmax.max_var, 0);
> -	destroy_hist_field(data->onmax.var, 0);
>  
>  	kfree(data->onmax.var_str);
>  	kfree(data->onmax.fn_name);
> @@ -3528,8 +3526,6 @@ static int onmax_create(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
>  	if (!ref_field)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	data->onmax.var = ref_field;
> -
>  	data->fn = onmax_save;
>  	data->onmax.max_var_ref_idx = var_ref_idx;
>  	max_var = create_var(hist_data, file, "max", sizeof(u64), "u64");
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux