Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/164] 3.2.65-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 08:26 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:14:25AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.65 release.
> > There are 164 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 14 06:14:25 UTC 2014.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> Build results:
> 	total: 111 pass: 107 fail: 4
> Failed builds:
> 	arm:mxs_defconfig
> 	mips:allmodconfig
> 	xtensa:defconfig
> 	xtensa:allmodconfig
> 
> Qemu tests:
> 	total: 20 pass: 20 fail: 0
> 
> The arm build failure looks like it is new, but it is due to 'Inconsistent
> kallsyms data' which I see randomly with arm builds, so it is not a real
> concern. It may show up now because I switched from the Yocto 1.4.2 toolchain
> to Yocto 1.7; as result some previously failing arm builds now pass while
> others now fail.
> 
> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.

Thanks for checking.  I caught a couple of build failures with your
build server before sending these out for review.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Kids!  Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous.  Do not attempt it in
your own home. - Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, `Good Omens'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]