From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
commit 944df75958807d56f2db9fdc769eb15dd9f0366a upstream.
[backport: resolve merge conflict due to missing xfs_rtxlen_t type]
minlen is the lower bound on the extent length that the caller can
accept, and maxlen is at this point the maximal available length.
This means a minlen extent is perfectly fine to use, so do it. This
matches the equivalent logic in xfs_rtallocate_extent_exact that also
accepts a minlen sized extent.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
index f2eb0c8b595d..5a439d90e51c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ xfs_rtallocate_extent_block(
/*
* Searched the whole thing & didn't find a maxlen free extent.
*/
- if (minlen < maxlen && besti != -1) {
+ if (minlen <= maxlen && besti != -1) {
xfs_extlen_t p; /* amount to trim length by */
/*
--
2.39.3
