Re: [PATCH] Revert "Bluetooth: hci_qca: Set BDA quirk bit if fwnode exists in DT"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Johan,

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 4:14 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:07:03PM -0400, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:48 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:39:03PM -0400, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 1:24 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 01:10:13PM -0400, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > I guess the following is the latest version:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=836664
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or are you working on a v5?
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch (revert) fixes a separate issue than the series you link to
> > > > > above, but it is also a prerequisite for that series.
> > > > >
> > > > > v4 is indeed the latest version, and it has been acked by Rob and Bjorn
> > > > > so you can take it all through the Bluetooth tree. Just remember to
> > > > > apply this patch (the revert) first.
> > > >
> > > > Doesn't seem to apply cleanly:
> > > >
> > > > Applying: Bluetooth: qca: fix device-address endianness
> > > > error: patch failed: drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c:1904
> > > > error: drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c: patch does not apply
> > > > Patch failed at 0004 Bluetooth: qca: fix device-address endianness
> > >
> > > Did you apply this patch (the revert) before trying to apply the series?
> >
> > Probably needs rebasing:
> >
> > Applying: Revert "Bluetooth: hci_qca: Set BDA quirk bit if fwnode exists in DT"
> > error: drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c: does not match index
> > Patch failed at 0001 Revert "Bluetooth: hci_qca: Set BDA quirk bit if
> > fwnode exists in DT"
>
> I just verified that it applies cleanly to 6.9-rc1.
>
>         $ git checkout tmp v6.9-rc1
>         $ b4 am -sl ZgHVFjAZ1uqEiUa2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         ...
>         $ git am ./20240314_johan_linaro_revert_bluetooth_hci_qca_set_bda_quirk_bit_if_fwnode_exists_in_dt.mbx
>         Applying: Revert "Bluetooth: hci_qca: Set BDA quirk bit if fwnode exists in DT"
>         $ b4 am -sl 20240320075554.8178-2-johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx
>         ...
>         $ git am ./v4_20240320_johan_linaro_bluetooth_qca_fix_device_address_endianness.mbx
>         Applying: dt-bindings: bluetooth: add 'qcom,local-bd-address-broken'
>         Applying: arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180-trogdor: mark bluetooth address as broken
>         Applying: Bluetooth: add quirk for broken address properties
>         Applying: Bluetooth: qca: fix device-address endianness
>
> Do you have anything else in your tree which may interfere? What tree is
> that exactly?

bluetooth-next tree, why would it be anything other than that? All the
CI automation is done on bluetooth-next and if you are asking to be
done via bluetooth tree which is based on the latest rc that is not
how things works here, we usually first apply to bluetooth-next and in
case it needs to be backported then it later done via pull-request.

> Johan



-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux