3.2.65-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
commit af958a38a60c7ca3d8a39c918c1baa2ff7b6b233 upstream.
This reverts commit 206a81c ("lzo: properly check for overruns").
As analysed by Willem Pinckaers, this fix is still incomplete on
certain rare corner cases, and it is easier to restart from the
original code.
Reported-by: Willem Pinckaers <willem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Don A. Bailey" <donb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/lzo/lzo1x_decompress_safe.c | 62 ++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/lzo/lzo1x_decompress_safe.c
+++ b/lib/lzo/lzo1x_decompress_safe.c
@@ -19,31 +19,11 @@
#include <linux/lzo.h>
#include "lzodefs.h"
-#define HAVE_IP(t, x) \
- (((size_t)(ip_end - ip) >= (size_t)(t + x)) && \
- (((t + x) >= t) && ((t + x) >= x)))
-
-#define HAVE_OP(t, x) \
- (((size_t)(op_end - op) >= (size_t)(t + x)) && \
- (((t + x) >= t) && ((t + x) >= x)))
-
-#define NEED_IP(t, x) \
- do { \
- if (!HAVE_IP(t, x)) \
- goto input_overrun; \
- } while (0)
-
-#define NEED_OP(t, x) \
- do { \
- if (!HAVE_OP(t, x)) \
- goto output_overrun; \
- } while (0)
-
-#define TEST_LB(m_pos) \
- do { \
- if ((m_pos) < out) \
- goto lookbehind_overrun; \
- } while (0)
+#define HAVE_IP(x) ((size_t)(ip_end - ip) >= (size_t)(x))
+#define HAVE_OP(x) ((size_t)(op_end - op) >= (size_t)(x))
+#define NEED_IP(x) if (!HAVE_IP(x)) goto input_overrun
+#define NEED_OP(x) if (!HAVE_OP(x)) goto output_overrun
+#define TEST_LB(m_pos) if ((m_pos) < out) goto lookbehind_overrun
int lzo1x_decompress_safe(const unsigned char *in, size_t in_len,
unsigned char *out, size_t *out_len)
@@ -78,14 +58,14 @@ int lzo1x_decompress_safe(const unsigned
while (unlikely(*ip == 0)) {
t += 255;
ip++;
- NEED_IP(1, 0);
+ NEED_IP(1);
}
t += 15 + *ip++;
}
t += 3;
copy_literal_run:
#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
- if (likely(HAVE_IP(t, 15) && HAVE_OP(t, 15))) {
+ if (likely(HAVE_IP(t + 15) && HAVE_OP(t + 15))) {
const unsigned char *ie = ip + t;
unsigned char *oe = op + t;
do {
@@ -101,8 +81,8 @@ copy_literal_run:
} else
#endif
{
- NEED_OP(t, 0);
- NEED_IP(t, 3);
+ NEED_OP(t);
+ NEED_IP(t + 3);
do {
*op++ = *ip++;
} while (--t > 0);
@@ -115,7 +95,7 @@ copy_literal_run:
m_pos -= t >> 2;
m_pos -= *ip++ << 2;
TEST_LB(m_pos);
- NEED_OP(2, 0);
+ NEED_OP(2);
op[0] = m_pos[0];
op[1] = m_pos[1];
op += 2;
@@ -139,10 +119,10 @@ copy_literal_run:
while (unlikely(*ip == 0)) {
t += 255;
ip++;
- NEED_IP(1, 0);
+ NEED_IP(1);
}
t += 31 + *ip++;
- NEED_IP(2, 0);
+ NEED_IP(2);
}
m_pos = op - 1;
next = get_unaligned_le16(ip);
@@ -157,10 +137,10 @@ copy_literal_run:
while (unlikely(*ip == 0)) {
t += 255;
ip++;
- NEED_IP(1, 0);
+ NEED_IP(1);
}
t += 7 + *ip++;
- NEED_IP(2, 0);
+ NEED_IP(2);
}
next = get_unaligned_le16(ip);
ip += 2;
@@ -174,7 +154,7 @@ copy_literal_run:
#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
if (op - m_pos >= 8) {
unsigned char *oe = op + t;
- if (likely(HAVE_OP(t, 15))) {
+ if (likely(HAVE_OP(t + 15))) {
do {
COPY8(op, m_pos);
op += 8;
@@ -184,7 +164,7 @@ copy_literal_run:
m_pos += 8;
} while (op < oe);
op = oe;
- if (HAVE_IP(6, 0)) {
+ if (HAVE_IP(6)) {
state = next;
COPY4(op, ip);
op += next;
@@ -192,7 +172,7 @@ copy_literal_run:
continue;
}
} else {
- NEED_OP(t, 0);
+ NEED_OP(t);
do {
*op++ = *m_pos++;
} while (op < oe);
@@ -201,7 +181,7 @@ copy_literal_run:
#endif
{
unsigned char *oe = op + t;
- NEED_OP(t, 0);
+ NEED_OP(t);
op[0] = m_pos[0];
op[1] = m_pos[1];
op += 2;
@@ -214,15 +194,15 @@ match_next:
state = next;
t = next;
#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
- if (likely(HAVE_IP(6, 0) && HAVE_OP(4, 0))) {
+ if (likely(HAVE_IP(6) && HAVE_OP(4))) {
COPY4(op, ip);
op += t;
ip += t;
} else
#endif
{
- NEED_IP(t, 3);
- NEED_OP(t, 0);
+ NEED_IP(t + 3);
+ NEED_OP(t);
while (t > 0) {
*op++ = *ip++;
t--;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html