On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 00:55, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello! > > On 13/03/24 10:45 a. m., Sasha Levin wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.213 release. > > There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Fri Mar 15 04:46:39 PM UTC 2024. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-5.10.y&id2=v5.10.212 > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > Thanks, > > Sasha > > We're seeing regressions while building PowerPC with GCC 8 and 12 with ppc6xx_defconfig: > > -----8<----- > /builds/linux/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:22:20: error: 'FB_BACKLIGHT_LEVELS' undeclared here (not in a function) > 22 | static u8 bl_curve[FB_BACKLIGHT_LEVELS]; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/kernel.h:15, > from /builds/linux/include/asm-generic/bug.h:20, > from /builds/linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h:109, > from /builds/linux/include/linux/bug.h:5, > from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:12, > from /builds/linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h:264, > from /builds/linux/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:11: > ----->8----- > > Bisection points to: > > commit ee550f669e91c4cb0c884f38aa915497bc201585 > Author: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Mar 6 13:28:20 2024 +0100 > arch/powerpc: Remove <linux/fb.h> from backlight code > > > Reverting that commit made the build pass again. > > Reproducer: > > tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch powerpc --toolchain gcc-12 --kconfig ppc6xx_defconfig > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Greetings! > > Daniel Díaz > daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx Apologies for replying to the wrong email here -- it should have been for 5.10.214-rc1. Naresh took care of relaying the information to the right place. -- ddiaz
