From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit e06cc89475eddc1f3a7a4d471524256152c68166 ]
At space_info.c we have several places where we access the ->reserved
field of a block reserve without taking the block reserve's spinlock
first, which makes KCSAN warn about a data race since that field is
always updated while holding the spinlock.
The reports from KCSAN are like the following:
[117.193526] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_block_rsv_release [btrfs] / need_preemptive_reclaim [btrfs]
[117.195148] read to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 6303 on cpu 3:
[117.195172] need_preemptive_reclaim+0x222/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[117.195992] __reserve_bytes+0xbb0/0xdc8 [btrfs]
[117.196807] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x4c/0x120 [btrfs]
[117.197620] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x78/0xa8 [btrfs]
[117.198434] btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x154/0x368 [btrfs]
[117.199300] btrfs_update_inode+0x108/0x1c8 [btrfs]
[117.200122] btrfs_dirty_inode+0xb4/0x140 [btrfs]
[117.200937] btrfs_update_time+0x8c/0xb0 [btrfs]
[117.201754] touch_atime+0x16c/0x1e0
[117.201789] filemap_read+0x674/0x728
[117.201823] btrfs_file_read_iter+0xf8/0x410 [btrfs]
[117.202653] vfs_read+0x2b6/0x498
[117.203454] ksys_read+0xa2/0x150
[117.203473] __s390x_sys_read+0x68/0x88
[117.203495] do_syscall+0x1c6/0x210
[117.203517] __do_syscall+0xc8/0xf0
[117.203539] system_call+0x70/0x98
[117.203579] write to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 11 on cpu 0:
[117.203604] btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x2e8/0x578 [btrfs]
[117.204432] btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata+0x7c/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[117.205259] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x37c/0x5e0 [btrfs]
[117.206093] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x356/0x498 [btrfs]
[117.206917] btrfs_work_helper+0x160/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[117.207738] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838
[117.207768] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10
[117.207797] kthread+0x21a/0x230
[117.207830] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8
[117.207861] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30
So add a helper to get the reserved amount of a block reserve while
holding the lock. The value may be not be up to date anymore when used by
need_preemptive_reclaim() and btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(), but
that's ok since the worst it can do is cause more reclaim work do be done
sooner rather than later. Reading the field while holding the lock instead
of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load
tearing.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h
index b0bd12b8652f4..fb440a074700a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h
@@ -101,4 +101,20 @@ static inline bool btrfs_block_rsv_full(const struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv)
return data_race(rsv->full);
}
+/*
+ * Get the reserved mount of a block reserve in a context where getting a stale
+ * value is acceptable, instead of accessing it directly and trigger data race
+ * warning from KCSAN.
+ */
+static inline u64 btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv)
+{
+ u64 ret;
+
+ spin_lock(&rsv->lock);
+ ret = rsv->reserved;
+ spin_unlock(&rsv->lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
#endif /* BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_H */
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
index 571bb13587d5e..3b54eb5834746 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
static bool need_preemptive_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info)
{
- u64 global_rsv_size = fs_info->global_block_rsv.reserved;
+ const u64 global_rsv_size = btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(&fs_info->global_block_rsv);
u64 ordered, delalloc;
u64 thresh;
u64 used;
@@ -956,8 +956,8 @@ static bool need_preemptive_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
ordered = percpu_counter_read_positive(&fs_info->ordered_bytes) >> 1;
delalloc = percpu_counter_read_positive(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes);
if (ordered >= delalloc)
- used += fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv.reserved +
- fs_info->delayed_block_rsv.reserved;
+ used += btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(&fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv) +
+ btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(&fs_info->delayed_block_rsv);
else
used += space_info->bytes_may_use - global_rsv_size;
@@ -1173,7 +1173,7 @@ static void btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(struct work_struct *work)
enum btrfs_flush_state flush;
u64 delalloc_size = 0;
u64 to_reclaim, block_rsv_size;
- u64 global_rsv_size = global_rsv->reserved;
+ const u64 global_rsv_size = btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(global_rsv);
loops++;
@@ -1185,9 +1185,9 @@ static void btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(struct work_struct *work)
* assume it's tied up in delalloc reservations.
*/
block_rsv_size = global_rsv_size +
- delayed_block_rsv->reserved +
- delayed_refs_rsv->reserved +
- trans_rsv->reserved;
+ btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_block_rsv) +
+ btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_refs_rsv) +
+ btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(trans_rsv);
if (block_rsv_size < space_info->bytes_may_use)
delalloc_size = space_info->bytes_may_use - block_rsv_size;
@@ -1207,16 +1207,16 @@ static void btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(struct work_struct *work)
to_reclaim = delalloc_size;
flush = FLUSH_DELALLOC;
} else if (space_info->bytes_pinned >
- (delayed_block_rsv->reserved +
- delayed_refs_rsv->reserved)) {
+ (btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_block_rsv) +
+ btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_refs_rsv))) {
to_reclaim = space_info->bytes_pinned;
flush = COMMIT_TRANS;
- } else if (delayed_block_rsv->reserved >
- delayed_refs_rsv->reserved) {
- to_reclaim = delayed_block_rsv->reserved;
+ } else if (btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_block_rsv) >
+ btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_refs_rsv)) {
+ to_reclaim = btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_block_rsv);
flush = FLUSH_DELAYED_ITEMS_NR;
} else {
- to_reclaim = delayed_refs_rsv->reserved;
+ to_reclaim = btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_refs_rsv);
flush = FLUSH_DELAYED_REFS_NR;
}
--
2.43.0
