On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:09:59 +0000 Lee Jones wrote: > > The 5.15 / 5.10 / 5.4 fixes won't be effective, tho. I don't see > > commit aec7961916f3f9e88766 in the other LTS branches. Without that > > (it's still correct but) it doesn't fix the problem, because we still > > touch the context after releasing the reference (unlocking the spin > > lock). > > No problem. > > Should I accompany aec7961916f3 with this fix into the aforementioned > branches then? Would that then be effective? Yes, (and c57ca512f3b68d, that's all the pre-req, I think.) Tho, it may be a more tedious backport. FWIW tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c should be relatively solid.
