Den tis 5 mars 2024 kl 10:34 skrev Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:21:46AM +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > > Den tis 5 mars 2024 kl 10:20 skrev Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:07:37AM +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > > > > Den tis 5 mars 2024 kl 09:32 skrev Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:58:57AM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.7.9 release. > > > > > > There are 163 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Mar 2024 07:46:26 +0000. > > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > > Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > riscv: Save/restore envcfg CSR during CPU suspend > > > > > > > > > > > > Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > riscv: Add a custom ISA extension for the [ms]envcfg CSR > > > > > > > > > > I left a comment in response to the off-list email about this patch, > > > > > I don't think it's gonna work as the number this custom extension has > > > > > been given exceeds the max in 6.7/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > riscv: Fix enabling cbo.zero when running in M-mode > > > > > > > > Works fine on my Arch Linux desktop with model name : AMD Ryzen 5 > > > > 5600 6-Core Processor > > > > after the Arch Linux manual intervention for new mkinitcpio settings > > > > and version in Arch > > > > > > > > Tested by: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This problem is riscv only, your x86 machine should not be affected > > > by it. > > > > Ah alright then i know, did feel like compiling the latest test kernel > > anyways, but thanks for the heads up > > Ah, I understand now. You meant to reply saying that you had tested > 6.7.9-rc2 but you replied to me instead of Greg's original posting which > confused me into thinking you tried to test these specific patches. > Yeah sorry i did reply all in Gmail, maybe should just only have replied to Greg and the mailinglist sorry for the confusion
