5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@xxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit f0a0fc10abb062d122db5ac4ed42f6d1ca342649 ] There is a loophole in pstate limit clamping for the intel_cpufreq CPU frequency scaling driver (intel_pstate in passive mode), schedutil CPU frequency scaling governor, HWP (HardWare Pstate) control enabled, when the adjust_perf call back path is used. Fix it. Fixes: a365ab6b9dfb cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index dd5f4eee9ffb6..4de71e772f514 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -2787,6 +2787,9 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpunum, if (min_pstate < cpu->min_perf_ratio) min_pstate = cpu->min_perf_ratio; + if (min_pstate > cpu->max_perf_ratio) + min_pstate = cpu->max_perf_ratio; + max_pstate = min(cap_pstate, cpu->max_perf_ratio); if (max_pstate < min_pstate) max_pstate = min_pstate; -- 2.43.0
