6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 41532b785e9d79636b3815a64ddf6a096647d011 ]
If we're not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There's no
reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us
up and return its result.
We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I'm not seeing a
UAF as I did in the past, I think aec7961916f3 ("tls: fix race between
async notify and socket close") took care of it.
This will make the next fix easier.
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/47bde5f649707610eaef9f0d679519966fc31061.1709132643.git.sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Stable-dep-of: 13114dc55430 ("tls: fix use-after-free on failed backlog decryption")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 0af2a698c3d08..733dbae9b057c 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -274,9 +274,15 @@ static int tls_do_decryption(struct sock *sk,
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&ctx->decrypt_pending) < 1);
atomic_inc(&ctx->decrypt_pending);
} else {
+ DECLARE_CRYPTO_WAIT(wait);
+
aead_request_set_callback(aead_req,
CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
- crypto_req_done, &ctx->async_wait);
+ crypto_req_done, &wait);
+ ret = crypto_aead_decrypt(aead_req);
+ if (ret == -EINPROGRESS || ret == -EBUSY)
+ ret = crypto_wait_req(ret, &wait);
+ return ret;
}
ret = crypto_aead_decrypt(aead_req);
@@ -285,10 +291,7 @@ static int tls_do_decryption(struct sock *sk,
ret = ret ?: -EINPROGRESS;
}
if (ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
- if (darg->async)
- return 0;
-
- ret = crypto_wait_req(ret, &ctx->async_wait);
+ return 0;
} else if (darg->async) {
atomic_dec(&ctx->decrypt_pending);
}
--
2.43.0
