Re: Backport fix for CVE-2023-2176 (8d037973 and 0e158630) to v6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:05:39PM +0530, Ajay Kaher wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:13 AM Brennan Lamoreaux
> <brennan.lamoreaux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > If you provide a working backport of that commit, we will be glad to
> > > apply it.  As-is, it does not apply at all, which is why it was never
> > > added to the 6.1.y tree.
> >
> > Oh, apologies for requesting if they don't apply. I'd be happy to submit
> > working backports for these patches, but I am not seeing any issues applying/building
> > the patches on my machine... Both patches in sequence applied directly and my
> > local build was successful.
> >
> > This is the workflow I tested:
> >
> > git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
> > git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> > git cherry-pick -x 8d037973d48c026224ab285e6a06985ccac6f7bf
> > git cherry-pick -x 0e15863015d97c1ee2cc29d599abcc7fa2dc3e95
> > make allyesconfig
> > make
> >
> > Please let me know if I've made a mistake with the above commands, or if these patches aren't applicable
> > for some other reason.
> >
> 
> I guess the reason is:
> 
> 8d037973d48c026224ab285e6a06985ccac6f7bf doesn't have "Fixes:" and is
> not sent to stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> And 0e15863015d97c1ee2cc29d599abcc7fa2dc3e95 is to Fix
> 8d037973d48c026224ab285e6a06985ccac6f7bf,
> so no need of 0e158 if 8d03 not backported to that particular branch.

Ok, so there's nothing to do here, great!  If there is, please let us
know.

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux