6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 4530b3660d396a646aad91a787b6ab37cf604b53 ]
Determine if the group block bitmap is corrupted before using ac_b_ex in
ext4_mb_try_best_found() to avoid allocating blocks from a group with a
corrupted block bitmap in the following concurrency and making the
situation worse.
ext4_mb_regular_allocator
ext4_lock_group(sb, group)
ext4_mb_good_group
// check if the group bbitmap is corrupted
ext4_mb_complex_scan_group
// Scan group gets ac_b_ex but doesn't use it
ext4_unlock_group(sb, group)
ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(group)
// The block bitmap was corrupted during
// the group unlock gap.
ext4_mb_try_best_found
ext4_lock_group(ac->ac_sb, group)
ext4_mb_use_best_found
mb_mark_used
// Allocating blocks in block bitmap corrupted group
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-7-libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 296185cbd1547..744472c0b6fa5 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2176,6 +2176,9 @@ int ext4_mb_try_best_found(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
return err;
ext4_lock_group(ac->ac_sb, group);
+ if (unlikely(EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(e4b->bd_info)))
+ goto out;
+
max = mb_find_extent(e4b, ex.fe_start, ex.fe_len, &ex);
if (max > 0) {
@@ -2183,6 +2186,7 @@ int ext4_mb_try_best_found(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b);
}
+out:
ext4_unlock_group(ac->ac_sb, group);
ext4_mb_unload_buddy(e4b);
--
2.43.0
