5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit bee024d20451e4ce04ea30099cad09f7f75d288b ]
We need to print num_sle first then pbl->max_buf per the condition.
Also replace mem->pbl with pbl while at it.
Fixes: 303ae1cdfdf7 ("rdma/siw: application interface")
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821133255.31111-3-guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx
Acked-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
index 9c7fbda9e068a..124242e387a59 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ int siw_map_mr_sg(struct ib_mr *base_mr, struct scatterlist *sl, int num_sle,
if (pbl->max_buf < num_sle) {
siw_dbg_mem(mem, "too many SGE's: %d > %d\n",
- mem->pbl->max_buf, num_sle);
+ num_sle, pbl->max_buf);
return -ENOMEM;
}
for_each_sg(sl, slp, num_sle, i) {
--
2.43.0
