6.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit c5e27b1a779ec25779d04c3af65aebaee6bd4304 ]
Neither struct nvmet_fc_tgt_queue nor struct nvmet_fc_tgt_assoc are data
structure which are used in a RCU context. So there is no reason to
delay the free operation.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/nvme/target/fc.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
index bb0791c9c0e3a..5fd37e989106c 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
@@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ struct nvmet_fc_tgt_queue {
struct list_head avail_defer_list;
struct workqueue_struct *work_q;
struct kref ref;
- struct rcu_head rcu;
/* array of fcp_iods */
struct nvmet_fc_fcp_iod fod[] __counted_by(sqsize);
} __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long long));
@@ -169,7 +168,6 @@ struct nvmet_fc_tgt_assoc {
struct nvmet_fc_tgt_queue *queues[NVMET_NR_QUEUES + 1];
struct kref ref;
struct work_struct del_work;
- struct rcu_head rcu;
};
@@ -852,7 +850,7 @@ nvmet_fc_tgt_queue_free(struct kref *ref)
destroy_workqueue(queue->work_q);
- kfree_rcu(queue, rcu);
+ kfree(queue);
}
static void
@@ -1185,8 +1183,8 @@ nvmet_fc_target_assoc_free(struct kref *ref)
dev_info(tgtport->dev,
"{%d:%d} Association freed\n",
tgtport->fc_target_port.port_num, assoc->a_id);
- kfree_rcu(assoc, rcu);
nvmet_fc_tgtport_put(tgtport);
+ kfree(assoc);
}
static void
--
2.43.0
