On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 09:00:50PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote: > commit 2331fd4a49864e1571b4f50aa3aa1536ed6220d0 upstream. > > After updating bb_free in mb_free_blocks, it is possible to return without > updating bb_fragments because the block being freed is found to have > already been freed, which leads to inconsistency between bb_free and > bb_fragments. > > Since the group may be unlocked in ext4_grp_locked_error(), this can lead > to problems such as dividing by zero when calculating the average fragment > length. Hence move the update of bb_free to after the block double-free > check guarantees that the corresponding statistics are updated only after > the core block bitmap is modified. > > Fixes: eabe0444df90 ("ext4: speed-up releasing blocks on commit") > CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.10 > Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-5-libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) We also need this for 5.10.y and older, right? Queued up now, thanks! greg k-h