The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 584f3894262634596532cf43a5e782e34a0ce374 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to '2024022732-wrought-cardiac-a27a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 584f38942626 ("mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr") aab4d8564947 ("net: mptcp: use policy generated by YAML spec") 1e07938e29c5 ("net: mptcp: rename netlink handlers to mptcp_pm_nl_<blah>_{doit,dumpit}") 1d0507f46843 ("net: mptcp: convert netlink from small_ops to ops") 740ebe35bd3f ("mptcp: add struct mptcp_sched_ops") 6ba7ce89905c ("mptcp: unify pm set_flags interfaces") a963853fd465 ("mptcp: use net instead of sock_net") dfc8d0603033 ("mptcp: implement delayed seq generation for passive fastopen") d15697185404 ("mptcp: allow privileged operations from user namespaces") 9c5d03d36251 ("genetlink: start to validate reserved header bytes") 02739545951a ("net: Fix data-races around sysctl_[rw]mem(_offset)?.") 892f396c8e68 ("mptcp: netlink: issue MP_PRIO signals from userspace PMs") a657430260e5 ("mptcp: Acquire the subflow socket lock before modifying MP_PRIO flags") c21b50d5912b ("mptcp: Avoid acquiring PM lock for subflow priority changes") 6f664045c868 ("Merge tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2022-05-26' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 584f3894262634596532cf43a5e782e34a0ce374 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:25:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr Just the same as userspace PM, a new parameter needs_id is added for in-kernel PM mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr() too. Add a new helper mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id() to check whether an address ID is set from PM or not. In mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(), needs_id is always true, but in mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(), pass mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id() to needs_it. Fixes: efd5a4c04e18 ("mptcp: add the address ID assignment bitmap") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index 287a60381eae..a24c9128dee9 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -901,7 +901,8 @@ static void __mptcp_pm_release_addr_entry(struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry) } static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, - struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry) + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry, + bool needs_id) { struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *cur, *del_entry = NULL; unsigned int addr_max; @@ -949,7 +950,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, } } - if (!entry->addr.id) { + if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id) { find_next: entry->addr.id = find_next_zero_bit(pernet->id_bitmap, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1, @@ -960,7 +961,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, } } - if (!entry->addr.id) + if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id) goto out; __set_bit(entry->addr.id, pernet->id_bitmap); @@ -1092,7 +1093,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_addr_info *skc entry->ifindex = 0; entry->flags = MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_IMPLICIT; entry->lsk = NULL; - ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry); + ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, true); if (ret < 0) kfree(entry); @@ -1285,6 +1286,18 @@ static int mptcp_nl_add_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct net *net) return 0; } +static bool mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(const struct nlattr *attr, + struct genl_info *info) +{ + struct nlattr *tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX + 1]; + + if (!nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX, attr, + mptcp_pm_address_nl_policy, info->extack) && + tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ID]) + return true; + return false; +} + int mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) { struct nlattr *attr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ENDPOINT_ADDR]; @@ -1326,7 +1339,8 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) goto out_free; } } - ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry); + ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, + !mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(attr, info)); if (ret < 0) { GENL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(info, "too many addresses or duplicate one: %d", ret); goto out_free;
