$ ./check btrfs/14[6-9] btrfs/15[8-9]
The stale fsid matches the testcase btrfs/146.
Unfortunately, the failure is inconsistent.
I will take another look tomorrow.
Thanks, Anand
Thanks, with this I can reproduce it and have some ideas what could go
wrong.
Thanks indeed.
I tested the following, it fixes the fsid problems and has passed full
fstests run. The temp-fsid test coverage needs to be done still.
@@ -1388,6 +1388,10 @@ struct btrfs_device
*btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, blk_mode_t flags,
if (ret)
btrfs_warn(NULL, "lookup bdev failed for path %s: %d",
path, ret);
+ if (devt) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "free stale devt (for path %s)\n", path);
+ btrfs_free_stale_devices(devt, NULL);
+ }
Right. I had this in mind to check for the stale devices. I'll do.
Anand
