Hi Greg, > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:13:21PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi, > > maybe you will not like introducing 'static int int_max = INT_MAX;' for > > this old kernel which EOL in 10 months. > That's fine, not a big deal :) Thanks for a quick info. I guess this is a reply to my question about SYSCTL_NEG_ONE failure on missing SYSCTL_NEG_ONE. Therefore I'll create static int __maybe_unused neg_one = -1; (which was used before 78e36f3b0dae). > > Cyril Hrubis (3): > > sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value > > sched/rt: sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice show default timeslice after reset > > sched/rt: Disallow writing invalid values to sched_rt_period_us > > kernel/sched/rt.c | 10 +++++----- > > kernel/sysctl.c | 5 +++++ > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Thanks for the patches, but they all got connected into the same thread, > making it impossible to detect which ones are for what branches :( > Can you put the version in the [PATCH X/Y] section like [PATCH 4.14 X/Y] > or just make separate threads so we have a chance? I'm sorry, I'll resent all patches properly. Kind regards, Petr > thanks, > greg k-h
