5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit a22fe1d6dec7e98535b97249fdc95c2be79120bb ]
is_slave_direction() should return true when direction is DMA_DEV_TO_DEV.
Fixes: 49920bc66984 ("dmaengine: add new enum dma_transfer_direction")
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240123172842.3764529-1-Frank.Li@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/dmaengine.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
index dd357a747780..4e4cce0ad4d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
+++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
@@ -949,7 +949,8 @@ static inline int dmaengine_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
static inline bool is_slave_direction(enum dma_transfer_direction direction)
{
- return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+ return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) ||
+ (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_DEV);
}
static inline struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dmaengine_prep_slave_single(
--
2.43.0
