5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit d694b754894c93fb4d71a7f3699439dec111decc ]
xt_check_{match,target} expects u16, but NFTA_RULE_COMPAT_PROTO is u32.
NLA_POLICY_MAX(NLA_BE32, 65535) cannot be used because .max in
nla_policy is s16, see 3e48be05f3c7 ("netlink: add attribute range
validation to policy").
Fixes: 0ca743a55991 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add compatibility layer for x_tables")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nft_compat.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
index 025f5189f2ce..77c7362a7db8 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy nft_rule_compat_policy[NFTA_RULE_COMPAT_MAX + 1]
static int nft_parse_compat(const struct nlattr *attr, u16 *proto, bool *inv)
{
struct nlattr *tb[NFTA_RULE_COMPAT_MAX+1];
+ u32 l4proto;
u32 flags;
int err;
@@ -210,7 +211,12 @@ static int nft_parse_compat(const struct nlattr *attr, u16 *proto, bool *inv)
if (flags & NFT_RULE_COMPAT_F_INV)
*inv = true;
- *proto = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_RULE_COMPAT_PROTO]));
+ l4proto = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_RULE_COMPAT_PROTO]));
+ if (l4proto > U16_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ *proto = l4proto;
+
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
