[PATCH 5.10 127/379] rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu: fix the usage of read_seqbegin_or_lock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit bad1a11c0f061aa073bab785389fe04f19ba02e1 ]

rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu() should make the "seq" counter odd on the
second pass, otherwise read_seqbegin_or_lock() never takes the lock.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231117164846.GA10410@xxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/rxrpc/conn_service.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c
index 68508166bbc0..af0e95ef992d 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_service.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct rxrpc_connection *rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu(struct rxrpc_peer *peer,
 	struct rxrpc_conn_proto k;
 	struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp = rxrpc_skb(skb);
 	struct rb_node *p;
-	unsigned int seq = 0;
+	unsigned int seq = 1;
 
 	k.epoch	= sp->hdr.epoch;
 	k.cid	= sp->hdr.cid & RXRPC_CIDMASK;
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct rxrpc_connection *rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu(struct rxrpc_peer *peer,
 		 * under just the RCU read lock, so we have to check for
 		 * changes.
 		 */
+		seq++; /* 2 on the 1st/lockless path, otherwise odd */
 		read_seqbegin_or_lock(&peer->service_conn_lock, &seq);
 
 		p = rcu_dereference_raw(peer->service_conns.rb_node);
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux