5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
commit f342de4e2f33e0e39165d8639387aa6c19dff660 upstream.
This reverts commit e0abdadcc6e1.
core.c:nf_hook_slow assumes that the upper 16 bits of NF_DROP
verdicts contain a valid errno, i.e. -EPERM, -EHOSTUNREACH or similar,
or 0.
Due to the reverted commit, its possible to provide a positive
value, e.g. NF_ACCEPT (1), which results in use-after-free.
Its not clear to me why this commit was made.
NF_QUEUE is not used by nftables; "queue" rules in nftables
will result in use of "nft_queue" expression.
If we later need to allow specifiying errno values from userspace
(do not know why), this has to call NF_DROP_GETERR and check that
"err <= 0" holds true.
Fixes: e0abdadcc6e1 ("netfilter: nf_tables: accept QUEUE/DROP verdict parameters")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Notselwyn <notselwyn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 16 ++++++----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -9340,16 +9340,10 @@ static int nft_verdict_init(const struct
data->verdict.code = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_VERDICT_CODE]));
switch (data->verdict.code) {
- default:
- switch (data->verdict.code & NF_VERDICT_MASK) {
- case NF_ACCEPT:
- case NF_DROP:
- case NF_QUEUE:
- break;
- default:
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- fallthrough;
+ case NF_ACCEPT:
+ case NF_DROP:
+ case NF_QUEUE:
+ break;
case NFT_CONTINUE:
case NFT_BREAK:
case NFT_RETURN:
@@ -9384,6 +9378,8 @@ static int nft_verdict_init(const struct
data->verdict.chain = chain;
break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
}
desc->len = sizeof(data->verdict);
