6.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@xxxxxxxxx> commit 6cdedc18ba7b9dacc36466e27e3267d201948c8d upstream. The following 3 locks would race against each other, causing the deadlock situation in the Syzbot bug report: - j1939_socks_lock - active_session_list_lock - sk_session_queue_lock A reasonable fix is to change j1939_socks_lock to an rwlock, since in the rare situations where a write lock is required for the linked list that j1939_socks_lock is protecting, the code does not attempt to acquire any more locks. This would break the circular lock dependency, where, for example, the current thread already locks j1939_socks_lock and attempts to acquire sk_session_queue_lock, and at the same time, another thread attempts to acquire j1939_socks_lock while holding sk_session_queue_lock. NOTE: This patch along does not fix the unregister_netdevice bug reported by Syzbot; instead, it solves a deadlock situation to prepare for one or more further patches to actually fix the Syzbot bug, which appears to be a reference counting problem within the j1939 codebase. Reported-by: <syzbot+1591462f226d9cbf0564@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230721162226.8639-1-astrajoan@xxxxxxxxx [mkl: remove unrelated newline change] Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h | 2 +- net/can/j1939/main.c | 2 +- net/can/j1939/socket.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) --- a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h +++ b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct j1939_priv { unsigned int tp_max_packet_size; /* lock for j1939_socks list */ - spinlock_t j1939_socks_lock; + rwlock_t j1939_socks_lock; struct list_head j1939_socks; struct kref rx_kref; --- a/net/can/j1939/main.c +++ b/net/can/j1939/main.c @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(st return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); j1939_tp_init(priv); - spin_lock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + rwlock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->j1939_socks); mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock); --- a/net/can/j1939/socket.c +++ b/net/can/j1939/socket.c @@ -80,16 +80,16 @@ static void j1939_jsk_add(struct j1939_p jsk->state |= J1939_SOCK_BOUND; j1939_priv_get(priv); - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_add_tail(&jsk->list, &priv->j1939_socks); - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); } static void j1939_jsk_del(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sock *jsk) { - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_del_init(&jsk->list); - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); j1939_priv_put(priv); jsk->state &= ~J1939_SOCK_BOUND; @@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ bool j1939_sk_recv_match(struct j1939_pr struct j1939_sock *jsk; bool match = false; - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) { match = j1939_sk_recv_match_one(jsk, skcb); if (match) break; } - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); return match; } @@ -344,11 +344,11 @@ void j1939_sk_recv(struct j1939_priv *pr { struct j1939_sock *jsk; - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) { j1939_sk_recv_one(jsk, skb); } - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); } static void j1939_sk_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk) @@ -1080,12 +1080,12 @@ void j1939_sk_errqueue(struct j1939_sess } /* spread RX notifications to all sockets subscribed to this session */ - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) { if (j1939_sk_recv_match_one(jsk, &session->skcb)) __j1939_sk_errqueue(session, &jsk->sk, type); } - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); }; void j1939_sk_send_loop_abort(struct sock *sk, int err) @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struc struct j1939_sock *jsk; int error_code = ENETDOWN; - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) { jsk->sk.sk_err = error_code; if (!sock_flag(&jsk->sk, SOCK_DEAD)) @@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struc j1939_sk_queue_drop_all(priv, jsk, error_code); } - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); } static int j1939_sk_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
