Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: 9328/1: mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:20 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:03:50AM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > From: Wang Kefeng <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Attempt VMA lock-based page fault handling first, and fall back to the
> > existing mmap_lock-based handling if that fails, the ebizzy benchmark
> > shows 25% improvement on qemu with 2 cpus.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/Kconfig    |  1 +
> >  arch/arm/mm/fault.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> No git id?
>
> What kernel branch(s) does this go to?
>
> confused,

Sorry, I used the command from your earlier email about the merge conflict:
git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to
'2024021921-bleak-sputter-5ecf@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.7.y'
HEAD^..
but it didn't send both patches, so I formatted the patches I wanted
to send and sent it with the same command replacing "HEAD^.." with
"*.patch". What should I have done instead?

>
> greg k-h





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux