On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:01:06 +0000 "Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" <abuehaze@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 17/02/2024 00:31, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:01:20 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:13:09PM -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> >>> A gentle reminder.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> SJ
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 09:42:43 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:30:38 +0000 "Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" <abuehaze@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 08/02/2024 21:29, SeongJae Park wrote:
> >>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> While mq_perf_tests runs with the default kselftest timeout limit, which
> >>>>>> is 45 seconds, the test takes about 60 seconds to complete on i3.metal
> >>>>>> AWS instances. Hence, the test always times out. Increase the timeout
> >>>>>> to 100 seconds.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixes: 852c8cbf34d3 ("selftests/kselftest/runner.sh: Add 45 second timeout per test")
> >>>>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.4.x
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting | 1 +
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting b/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting
> >>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>> index 000000000000..54dc12287839
> >>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting
> >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> >>>>>> +timeout=100
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 2.39.2
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Added Vijai Kumar to CC
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This looks similar to [PATCH] kselftest: mqueue: increase timeout
> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220622085911.2292509-1-Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#r12820aede6bba015b70ae33323e29ae27d5b69c7
> >>>>> which was increasing the timeout to 180 however it's not clear why this
> >>>>> hasn't been merged yet.
> >>
> >> Should it be 100 or 180?
> Both options may work, I am more inclined to have this as 180 seconds by
> giving more time for the test to finish, this can be reduced later to
> 100 or something else if we start hearing complains about the new timeout.
Thank you for the opinion. I will send v2 with 180 seconds timeout.
Thanks,
SJ
>
> Hazem
> >
> > As mentioned on the previous mail[1], either values are good to me :)
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240215011309.73168-1-sj@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >> Either way:
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > SJ
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kees Cook
> >>
>
>
