The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 5bc09b397cbf1221f8a8aacb1152650c9195b02b # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to '2024021942-tabloid-clarinet-50d2@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 5bc09b397cbf ("nilfs2: fix potential bug in end_buffer_async_write") ff5710c3f3c2 ("nilfs2: convert nilfs_segctor_prepare_write to use folios") 3cd36212bf75 ("nilfs2: convert nilfs_segctor_complete_write to use folios") 50196f0081ca ("nilfs2: convert nilfs_abort_logs to use folios") 8f46eaf6fd84 ("nilfs2: add nilfs_end_folio_io()") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 5bc09b397cbf1221f8a8aacb1152650c9195b02b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 01:16:45 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: fix potential bug in end_buffer_async_write According to a syzbot report, end_buffer_async_write(), which handles the completion of block device writes, may detect abnormal condition of the buffer async_write flag and cause a BUG_ON failure when using nilfs2. Nilfs2 itself does not use end_buffer_async_write(). But, the async_write flag is now used as a marker by commit 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks") as a means of resolving double list insertion of dirty blocks in nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers() and nilfs_lookup_node_buffers() and the resulting crash. This modification is safe as long as it is used for file data and b-tree node blocks where the page caches are independent. However, it was irrelevant and redundant to also introduce async_write for segment summary and super root blocks that share buffers with the backing device. This led to the possibility that the BUG_ON check in end_buffer_async_write would fail as described above, if independent writebacks of the backing device occurred in parallel. The use of async_write for segment summary buffers has already been removed in a previous change. Fix this issue by removing the manipulation of the async_write flag for the remaining super root block buffer. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240203161645.4992-1-konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx Fixes: 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks") Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: syzbot+5c04210f7c7f897c1e7f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000019a97c05fd42f8c8@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c index 2590a0860eab..2bfb08052d39 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c @@ -1703,7 +1703,6 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci) list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers, b_assoc_buffers) { - set_buffer_async_write(bh); if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) { if (bh->b_folio != bd_folio) { folio_lock(bd_folio); @@ -1714,6 +1713,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci) } break; } + set_buffer_async_write(bh); if (bh->b_folio != fs_folio) { nilfs_begin_folio_io(fs_folio); fs_folio = bh->b_folio; @@ -1800,7 +1800,6 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list_head *logs, int err) list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers, b_assoc_buffers) { - clear_buffer_async_write(bh); if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) { clear_buffer_uptodate(bh); if (bh->b_folio != bd_folio) { @@ -1809,6 +1808,7 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list_head *logs, int err) } break; } + clear_buffer_async_write(bh); if (bh->b_folio != fs_folio) { nilfs_end_folio_io(fs_folio, err); fs_folio = bh->b_folio; @@ -1896,8 +1896,9 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci) BIT(BH_Delay) | BIT(BH_NILFS_Volatile) | BIT(BH_NILFS_Redirected)); - set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits); if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) { + set_buffer_uptodate(bh); + clear_buffer_dirty(bh); if (bh->b_folio != bd_folio) { folio_end_writeback(bd_folio); bd_folio = bh->b_folio; @@ -1905,6 +1906,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci) update_sr = true; break; } + set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits); if (bh->b_folio != fs_folio) { nilfs_end_folio_io(fs_folio, 0); fs_folio = bh->b_folio;
