On Tue, Feb 13, 2024, at 9:49 AM, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 07:37:35PM -0800, Samuel Holland wrote: >> The value of the [ms]envcfg CSR is lost when entering a nonretentive >> idle state, so the CSR must be rewritten when resuming the CPU. >> >> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v6.7+ >> Fixes: 43c16d51a19b ("RISC-V: Enable cbo.zero in usermode") >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Changes in v2: >> - Check for privileged ISA v1.12 instead of the specific CSR >> - Use riscv_has_extension_likely() instead of new ALTERNATIVE()s >> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h | 1 + >> arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c | 4 ++++ >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h >> index 02f87867389a..491296a335d0 100644 >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/suspend.h >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct suspend_context { >> struct pt_regs regs; >> /* Saved and restored by high-level functions */ >> unsigned long scratch; >> + unsigned long envcfg; >> unsigned long tvec; >> unsigned long ie; >> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c >> index 239509367e42..be03615486ed 100644 >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c >> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ >> void suspend_save_csrs(struct suspend_context *context) >> { >> context->scratch = csr_read(CSR_SCRATCH); >> + if (riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_Sx1p12)) >> + context->envcfg = csr_read(CSR_ENVCFG); >> context->tvec = csr_read(CSR_TVEC); >> context->ie = csr_read(CSR_IE); >> >> @@ -36,6 +38,8 @@ void suspend_save_csrs(struct suspend_context *context) >> void suspend_restore_csrs(struct suspend_context *context) >> { >> csr_write(CSR_SCRATCH, context->scratch); >> + if (riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_Sx1p12)) >> + csr_write(CSR_ENVCFG, context->envcfg); >> csr_write(CSR_TVEC, context->tvec); >> csr_write(CSR_IE, context->ie); >> >> -- >> 2.43.0 >> > > We're still exposing Zicboz to userspace in hwprobe when only > RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ is present, which will be the case for anything that > either doesn't implement 1.12, but does implement Zicboz, or maybe does > implement 1.12, but hasn't started putting Ss1p12 in its ISA string yet > (e.g. QEMU). We should either stop exposing Zicboz to userspace in those > cases (since it won't work) or rethink how we want to determine whether > or not we have envcfg CSRs. opensbi treats the existence of menvcfg as sufficient evidence to prove that the hart supports 1.12. I wouldn't object to having Zicboz imply Ss1p12/Sm1p12. -s > Thanks, > drew > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv