On 2/13/24 9:27 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:18:43AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> This first patch fails to apply to the 6.6.y tree, are you sure you made >>> it against the correct one? These functions do not look like this to >>> me. >> >> Sorry my bad, refreshing them for 6.1-stable and I guess I did that >> before I sent them out. Hence the mua used the new copy... >> >> Here are the ones I have in my local tree, from testing. > > Now queued up, but to confirm, 6.1.y did NOT need these, right? Correct, it's not required. Would be nice to have, but I'd need to backport more things. So I think it's better if we leave 6.1-stable as-is for now. -- Jens Axboe
