The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x dad6a09f3148257ac1773cd90934d721d68ab595 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to '2024021300-sagging-enhance-9113@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: dad6a09f3148 ("hrtimer: Report offline hrtimer enqueue") 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier") f61eff83cec9 ("hrtimer: Prepare support for PREEMPT_RT") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From dad6a09f3148257ac1773cd90934d721d68ab595 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:56:36 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] hrtimer: Report offline hrtimer enqueue The hrtimers migration on CPU-down hotplug process has been moved earlier, before the CPU actually goes to die. This leaves a small window of opportunity to queue an hrtimer in a blind spot, leaving it ignored. For example a practical case has been reported with RCU waking up a SCHED_FIFO task right before the CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD stage, queuing that way a sched/rt timer to the local offline CPU. Make sure such situations never go unnoticed and warn when that happens. Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier") Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129235646.3171983-4-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx diff --git a/include/linux/hrtimer.h b/include/linux/hrtimer.h index 87e3bedf8eb0..641c4567cfa7 100644 --- a/include/linux/hrtimer.h +++ b/include/linux/hrtimer.h @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ enum hrtimer_base_type { * @max_hang_time: Maximum time spent in hrtimer_interrupt * @softirq_expiry_lock: Lock which is taken while softirq based hrtimer are * expired + * @online: CPU is online from an hrtimers point of view * @timer_waiters: A hrtimer_cancel() invocation waits for the timer * callback to finish. * @expires_next: absolute time of the next event, is required for remote @@ -179,7 +180,8 @@ struct hrtimer_cpu_base { unsigned int hres_active : 1, in_hrtirq : 1, hang_detected : 1, - softirq_activated : 1; + softirq_activated : 1, + online : 1; #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS unsigned int nr_events; unsigned short nr_retries; diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c index 760793998cdd..edb0f821dcea 100644 --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c @@ -1085,6 +1085,7 @@ static int enqueue_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer, enum hrtimer_mode mode) { debug_activate(timer, mode); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!base->cpu_base->online); base->cpu_base->active_bases |= 1 << base->index; @@ -2183,6 +2184,7 @@ int hrtimers_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu) cpu_base->softirq_next_timer = NULL; cpu_base->expires_next = KTIME_MAX; cpu_base->softirq_expires_next = KTIME_MAX; + cpu_base->online = 1; hrtimer_cpu_base_init_expiry_lock(cpu_base); return 0; } @@ -2250,6 +2252,7 @@ int hrtimers_cpu_dying(unsigned int dying_cpu) smp_call_function_single(ncpu, retrigger_next_event, NULL, 0); raw_spin_unlock(&new_base->lock); + old_base->online = 0; raw_spin_unlock(&old_base->lock); return 0;
