Re: [PATCH] selftests/mqueue: Set timeout to 100 seconds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:30:38 +0000 "Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" <abuehaze@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 08/02/2024 21:29, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > While mq_perf_tests runs with the default kselftest timeout limit, which
> > is 45 seconds, the test takes about 60 seconds to complete on i3.metal
> > AWS instances.  Hence, the test always times out.  Increase the timeout
> > to 100 seconds.
> > 
> > Fixes: 852c8cbf34d3 ("selftests/kselftest/runner.sh: Add 45 second timeout per test")
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.4.x
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting b/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..54dc12287839
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/setting
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +timeout=100
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> > 
> >
> 
> Added Vijai Kumar to CC
> 
> This looks similar to [PATCH] kselftest: mqueue: increase timeout 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220622085911.2292509-1-Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#r12820aede6bba015b70ae33323e29ae27d5b69c7 
> which was increasing the timeout to 180 however it's not clear why this 
> hasn't been merged yet.

Thank you.  I don't care who's patch would be picked, but hope any of those be
merged.  For more eyes, I'm Cc-ing contacts from
`./scripts/get_maintainer.pl ipc/mqueue.c` output.

> I have seen the same issue on v5.15.y so it's 
> very likely that we will need to apply this on all LTS branches not just 
> 5.4 as mentioned in Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.4.x

Yes, that's the intent of the Fixes: and Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> lines.  I
hope the lines to be added to Vijai's patch if it is picked instead of this.


Thanks,
SJ

> 
> Hazem
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux