6.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 0d4ac04fa7c3f6dc263dba6f575a2ec7a2d4eca8 ]
imx7d uses two ports for 'in-ports', so the syntax port@<num> has to
be used. imx7d has both port and port@1 nodes present, raising these
error:
funnel@30041000: in-ports: More than one condition true in oneOf schema
funnel@30041000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed
('in-ports' was unexpected)
Fix this by also using port@0 for imx7s as well.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7d.dtsi | 3 ---
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7s.dtsi | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7d.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7d.dtsi
index 4b94b8afb55d..0484e349e064 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7d.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7d.dtsi
@@ -217,9 +217,6 @@
};
&ca_funnel_in_ports {
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
-
port@1 {
reg = <1>;
ca_funnel_in_port1: endpoint {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7s.dtsi
index 5387da8a2a0a..9f216d11a396 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7s.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7s.dtsi
@@ -190,7 +190,11 @@
clock-names = "apb_pclk";
ca_funnel_in_ports: in-ports {
- port {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
ca_funnel_in_port0: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&etm0_out_port>;
};
--
2.43.0
