6.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit e416514e309f7e25e577fee45a65f246f67b2261 ] Since 'rtw89_core_tx_kick_off_and_wait()' assumes timeout (actually RTW89_ROC_TX_TIMEOUT) in milliseconds, I suppose that RTW89_ROC_IDLE_TIMEOUT is in milliseconds as well. If so, 'msecs_to_jiffies()' should be used in a call to 'ieee80211_queue_delayed_work()' from 'rtw89_roc_end()'. Compile tested only. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024143137.30393-1-dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c index 3d75165e48be..a3624ebf01b7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c @@ -2886,7 +2886,7 @@ void rtw89_roc_end(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif) if (hw->conf.flags & IEEE80211_CONF_IDLE) ieee80211_queue_delayed_work(hw, &roc->roc_work, - RTW89_ROC_IDLE_TIMEOUT); + msecs_to_jiffies(RTW89_ROC_IDLE_TIMEOUT)); } void rtw89_roc_work(struct work_struct *work) -- 2.43.0