[PATCH 6.1 019/219] ACPI: NUMA: Fix the logic of getting the fake_pxm value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit e3f577830ce216b0ca21d4750cbbd64cfc21efff ]

The for loop does not iterate over the last element of the node_to_pxm_map
array. This could lead to a conflict between the final fake_pxm value and
the existing pxm values. That is, the final fake_pxm value can not be
guaranteed to be an unused pxm value.

While at it, fix up white space in slit_valid().

Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@xxxxxxxxx>
[ rjw: Changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
index 12f330b0eac0..b57de78fbf14 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int __init slit_valid(struct acpi_table_slit *slit)
 	int i, j;
 	int d = slit->locality_count;
 	for (i = 0; i < d; i++) {
-		for (j = 0; j < d; j++)  {
+		for (j = 0; j < d; j++) {
 			u8 val = slit->entry[d*i + j];
 			if (i == j) {
 				if (val != LOCAL_DISTANCE)
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
 	 */
 
 	/* fake_pxm is the next unused PXM value after SRAT parsing */
-	for (i = 0, fake_pxm = -1; i < MAX_NUMNODES - 1; i++) {
+	for (i = 0, fake_pxm = -1; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) {
 		if (node_to_pxm_map[i] > fake_pxm)
 			fake_pxm = node_to_pxm_map[i];
 	}
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux