RE: [PATCH 5.15.x] RDMA/irdma: Ensure iWarp QP queue memory is OS paged aligned

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15.x] RDMA/irdma: Ensure iWarp QP queue memory is OS
> paged aligned
> 
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 02:21:43PM -0600, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> > From: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 0a5ec366de7e94192669ba08de6ed336607fd282 ]
> >
> > The SQ is shared for between kernel and used by storing the kernel
> > page pointer and passing that to a kmap_atomic().
> >
> > This then requires that the alignment is PAGE_SIZE aligned.
> >
> > Fix by adding an iWarp specific alignment check.
> >
> > The patch needed to be reworked because the separate routines present
> > upstream are not there in older irdma drivers.
> >
> > Fixes: e965ef0e7b2c ("RDMA/irdma: Split QP handler into
> > irdma_reg_user_mr_type_qp")
> > Link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231129202143.1434-3-shiraz.saleem@xxxxxxxx
> > m
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c
> > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c
> > index 745712e1d7de..e02f541430ad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c
> > @@ -2783,6 +2783,11 @@ static struct ib_mr *irdma_reg_user_mr(struct
> > ib_pd *pd, u64 start, u64 len,
> >
> >  	switch (req.reg_type) {
> >  	case IRDMA_MEMREG_TYPE_QP:
> > +		/* iWarp: Catch page not starting on OS page boundary */
> > +		if (!rdma_protocol_roce(&iwdev->ibdev, 1) &&
> > +		    ib_umem_offset(iwmr->region))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +
> >  		total = req.sq_pages + req.rq_pages + shadow_pgcnt;
> >  		if (total > iwmr->page_cnt) {
> >  			err = -EINVAL;
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
> >
> 
> You obviously did not test this change, as it fails to build, so why ask for it to be
> backported?  I've dropped all of these now from both 6.1.y and 5.15.y, please be
> more careful in the future.

I apologize for the oversight. we prematurely submitted.

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux