On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:50:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 09:03:34PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for your patch. > > > > FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied. > > > > The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-1 > > > > Rule: add the tag "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" in the sign-off area to have the patch automatically included in the stable tree. > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fs: move S_ISGID stripping into the vfs_*() helpers > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240124130025.2292-3-mngyadam%40amazon.com > > False positive :( Sorry for the false positive. The cover letter has a [PATCH 5.4] prefix while the patch has a common [PATCH] prefix, so the bot was confused and wrongly parsed the patchset. We have fix this issue now. [PATCH 5.4 0/2] backport add and use mode_strip_sgid in vfs_*() helpers Mahmoud Adam ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: add mode_strip_sgid() helper Mahmoud Adam ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: move S_ISGID stripping into the vfs_*() helpers Mahmoud Adam Best Regards, Yujie
