On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 2:20 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 02:35:15PM -0700, Dan Moulding wrote: > > > Or is the regression also in Linus's tree and both of these should be > > > reverted/dropped in order to keep systems ok until the bug is fixed in > > > Linus's tree? > > > > The regression is in Linus' tree and appeared with commit > > bed9e27baf52. I was operating under the assumption that the two > > commits (bed9e27baf52 and d6e035aad6c0) are intended to exist as a > > pair that should go together (the commit messages led me to believe > > so). > > > > The commit that caused the regression has already appeared in the > > 6.7.1 release (but without the second commit). Since I thought the two > > commits are a pair and the regression needs to be reverted, that the > > second commit should not be backported for 6.7.2 until the issue is > > properly resolved in Linus' tree. > > > > But it sounds like Song Liu is saying that the second commit > > (d6e035aad6c0) should actually be fine to accept on its own even > > though the other one needs to be reverted, and is not really dependent > > on the one that caused the regression [1]. So maybe it's fine to pick > > it up for 6.7.2. > > > > I can say that I have tested 6.7.1 plus just commit d6e035aad6c0 and I > > cannot reproduce the regression with it. But 6.7.1 plus both commits, > > I can still reproduce the regression. So bed9e27baf52 definitely needs > > to be reverted to eliminate the regression. > > > > I hope that clears things up some. > > Nope, not at all :) > > For now, I'm going to keep both commits in the stable trees, as that > matches what is in Linus's tree as this seems to be hard to reproduce > and I haven't seen any other reports of issues. Being in sync with what > is in Linus's tree is almost always good, that way if a fix happens > there, we can easily backport it to the stable trees too. > > So unless the maintainer(s) say otherwise, I'll just let this be. Thanks Greg! Yes, let's keep the tree as-is while we look into this issue. I tried to reproduce the issue from my side, but haven't hit it yet. Song