6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 113661e07460a6604aacc8ae1b23695a89e7d4b3 ]
It is still possible to set on the NFT_SET_CONCAT flag by specifying a
set size and no field description, report EINVAL in such case.
Fixes: 1b6345d4160e ("netfilter: nf_tables: check NFT_SET_CONCAT flag if field_count is specified")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 1f6d5ffbe34a..b28fbcb86e94 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -5010,8 +5010,12 @@ static int nf_tables_newset(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
if (err < 0)
return err;
- if (desc.field_count > 1 && !(flags & NFT_SET_CONCAT))
+ if (desc.field_count > 1) {
+ if (!(flags & NFT_SET_CONCAT))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (flags & NFT_SET_CONCAT) {
return -EINVAL;
+ }
} else if (flags & NFT_SET_CONCAT) {
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.43.0
