6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 0acd03a5bd188b0c501d285d938439618bd855c4 ]
Given verifier checks actual value, r0 has to be precise, so we need to
propagate precision properly. r0 also has to be marked as read,
otherwise subsequent state comparisons will ignore such register as
unimportant and precision won't really help here.
Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-4-andrii@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 824531d4c262..2deae0db03e8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9284,6 +9284,13 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
verbose(env, "R0 not a scalar value\n");
return -EACCES;
}
+
+ /* we are going to rely on register's precise value */
+ err = mark_reg_read(env, r0, r0->parent, REG_LIVE_READ64);
+ err = err ?: mark_chain_precision(env, BPF_REG_0);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
if (!tnum_in(range, r0->var_off)) {
verbose_invalid_scalar(env, r0, &range, "callback return", "R0");
return -EINVAL;
--
2.43.0
