[PATCH 6.6 060/583] pstore: ram_core: fix possible overflow in persistent_ram_init_ecc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 86222a8fc16ec517de8da2604d904c9df3a08e5d ]

In persistent_ram_init_ecc(), on 64-bit arches DIV_ROUND_UP() will return
64-bit value since persistent_ram_zone::buffer_size has type size_t which
is derived from the 64-bit *unsigned long*, while the ecc_blocks variable
this value gets assigned to has (always 32-bit) *int* type.  Even if that
value fits into *int* type, an overflow is still possible when calculating
the size_t typed ecc_total variable further below since there's no cast to
any 64-bit type before multiplication.  Declaring the ecc_blocks variable
as *size_t* should fix this mess...

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
analysis tool.

Fixes: 9cc05ad97c57 ("staging: android: persistent_ram: refactor ecc support")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231105202936.25694-1-s.shtylyov@xxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
index 650e437b55e6..f1848cdd6d34 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int persistent_ram_init_ecc(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz,
 {
 	int numerr;
 	struct persistent_ram_buffer *buffer = prz->buffer;
-	int ecc_blocks;
+	size_t ecc_blocks;
 	size_t ecc_total;
 
 	if (!ecc_info || !ecc_info->ecc_size)
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux