5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Judy Hsiao <judyhsiao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit e5dc5afff62f3e97e86c3643ec9fcad23de4f2d3 ]
We are seeing cases where neigh_cleanup_and_release() is called by
neigh_forced_gc() many times in a row with preemption turned off.
When running on a low powered CPU at a low CPU frequency, this has
been measured to keep preemption off for ~10 ms. That's not great on a
system with HZ=1000 which expects tasks to be able to schedule in
with ~1ms latency.
Suggested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Judy Hsiao <judyhsiao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/neighbour.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 927c4db2703f..5829477efbba 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int neigh_forced_gc(struct neigh_table *tbl)
{
int max_clean = atomic_read(&tbl->gc_entries) -
READ_ONCE(tbl->gc_thresh2);
+ u64 tmax = ktime_get_ns() + NSEC_PER_MSEC;
unsigned long tref = jiffies - 5 * HZ;
struct neighbour *n, *tmp;
int shrunk = 0;
+ int loop = 0;
NEIGH_CACHE_STAT_INC(tbl, forced_gc_runs);
@@ -250,11 +252,16 @@ static int neigh_forced_gc(struct neigh_table *tbl)
shrunk++;
if (shrunk >= max_clean)
break;
+ if (++loop == 16) {
+ if (ktime_get_ns() > tmax)
+ goto unlock;
+ loop = 0;
+ }
}
}
WRITE_ONCE(tbl->last_flush, jiffies);
-
+unlock:
write_unlock_bh(&tbl->lock);
return shrunk;
--
2.43.0
