[PATCH 5.10 120/286] bpf: fix check for attempt to corrupt spilled pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit ab125ed3ec1c10ccc36bc98c7a4256ad114a3dae ]

When register is spilled onto a stack as a 1/2/4-byte register, we set
slot_type[BPF_REG_SIZE - 1] (plus potentially few more below it,
depending on actual spill size). So to check if some stack slot has
spilled register we need to consult slot_type[7], not slot_type[0].

To avoid the need to remember and double-check this in the future, just
use is_spilled_reg() helper.

Fixes: 27113c59b6d0 ("bpf: Check the other end of slot_type for STACK_SPILL")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-4-andrii@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 45c50ee9b037..ddfd33703f4d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2493,7 +2493,7 @@ static int check_stack_write_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	 * so it's aligned access and [off, off + size) are within stack limits
 	 */
 	if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks &&
-	    state->stack[spi].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL &&
+	    is_spilled_reg(&state->stack[spi]) &&
 	    size != BPF_REG_SIZE) {
 		verbose(env, "attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack\n");
 		return -EACCES;
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux