6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 3cee9c635f27d1003d46f624d816f3455698b625 ] The expected name by the binding at this position is "msg" and the SoC's manual also calls the interrupt in question "msg", so fix the rk356x dtsi to use the correct name. Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114153834.934978-1-heiko@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi index 234b5bbda120..f4d6dbbbddcd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi @@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ pcie2x1: pcie@fe260000 { <GIC_SPI 73 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, <GIC_SPI 72 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, <GIC_SPI 71 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; - interrupt-names = "sys", "pmc", "msi", "legacy", "err"; + interrupt-names = "sys", "pmc", "msg", "legacy", "err"; bus-range = <0x0 0xf>; clocks = <&cru ACLK_PCIE20_MST>, <&cru ACLK_PCIE20_SLV>, <&cru ACLK_PCIE20_DBI>, <&cru PCLK_PCIE20>, -- 2.43.0
