From: Lin Ma <linma@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit c2b2ee36250d967c21890cb801e24af4b6a9eaa5 ]
It appears that there is a typo in the code where the nlattr array is
being parsed with policy br_cfm_cc_ccm_tx_policy, but the instance is
being accessed via IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_RDI_INSTANCE, which is associated
with the policy br_cfm_cc_rdi_policy.
This problem was introduced by commit 2be665c3940d ("bridge: cfm: Netlink
SET configuration Interface.").
Though it seems like a harmless typo since these two enum owns the exact
same value (1 here), it is quite misleading hence fix it by using the
correct enum IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_INSTANCE here.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c
index 5c4c369f8536..2faab44652e7 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int br_cc_ccm_tx_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct nlattr *attr,
memset(&tx_info, 0, sizeof(tx_info));
- instance = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_RDI_INSTANCE]);
+ instance = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_INSTANCE]);
nla_memcpy(&tx_info.dmac.addr,
tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_DMAC],
sizeof(tx_info.dmac.addr));
--
2.43.0
