6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 2b5dcb31a19a2e0acd869b12c9db9b2d696ef544 ]
>From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before.
>From commit e411901c0b775a3a ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms
for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64.
>From commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f8 ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program
to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs.
How about combining them all together?
1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram.
2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram.
3. The tailcall calls the subprogram's caller.
As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt
the machine.
As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack
and rax register between BPF subprograms. So do in trampolines.
Fixes: ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT")
Fixes: e411901c0b77 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT")
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-3-hffilwlqm@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 4 ++--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +++
4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 4686c1d9d0cfd..e6a031f8dd2e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -893,6 +893,10 @@ static void emit_nops(u8 **pprog, int len)
#define INSN_SZ_DIFF (((addrs[i] - addrs[i - 1]) - (prog - temp)))
+/* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */
+#define RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack) \
+ EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x85, -round_up(stack, 8) - 8)
+
static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image,
int oldproglen, struct jit_context *ctx, bool jmp_padding)
{
@@ -1436,9 +1440,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
if (tail_call_reachable) {
- /* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */
- EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x85,
- -round_up(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth, 8) - 8);
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth);
if (!imm32 || emit_call(&prog, func, image + addrs[i - 1] + 7))
return -EINVAL;
} else {
@@ -2070,6 +2072,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
* RBP - ip_off [ traced function ] BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG flag
*
* RBP - run_ctx_off [ bpf_tramp_run_ctx ]
+ * RSP [ tail_call_cnt ] BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX
*/
/* room for return value of orig_call or fentry prog */
@@ -2106,6 +2109,8 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
EMIT1(0x55); /* push rbp */
EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xE5); /* mov rbp, rsp */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xEC, stack_size); /* sub rsp, stack_size */
+ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
+ EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */
EMIT1(0x53); /* push rbx */
/* Store number of argument registers of the traced function:
@@ -2156,9 +2161,15 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off);
+ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
+ /* Before calling the original function, restore the
+ * tail_call_cnt from stack to rax.
+ */
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack_size);
+
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK) {
- emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, 8);
- EMIT2(0xff, 0xd0); /* call *rax */
+ emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_FP, 8);
+ EMIT2(0xff, 0xd3); /* call *rbx */
} else {
/* call original function */
if (emit_call(&prog, orig_call, prog)) {
@@ -2209,7 +2220,12 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
ret = -EINVAL;
goto cleanup;
}
- }
+ } else if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
+ /* Before running the original function, restore the
+ * tail_call_cnt from stack to rax.
+ */
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack_size);
+
/* restore return value of orig_call or fentry prog back into RAX */
if (save_ret)
emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, -8);
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 3ce9e39ecdb85..619fcba84be22 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -825,6 +825,11 @@ struct btf_func_model {
*/
#define BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY BIT(6)
+/* Indicate that current trampoline is in a tail call context. Then, it has to
+ * cache and restore tail_call_cnt to avoid infinite tail call loop.
+ */
+#define BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX BIT(7)
+
/* Each call __bpf_prog_enter + call bpf_func + call __bpf_prog_exit is ~50
* bytes on x86.
*/
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index c4381dfcd6b09..748ac86169941 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -443,8 +443,8 @@ static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, bool lock_direct_mut
goto out;
}
- /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY */
- tr->flags &= BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY;
+ /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY and TAIL_CALL_CTX */
+ tr->flags &= (BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY | BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX);
if (tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT].nr_links ||
tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN].nr_links) {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 12d360d80c149..ee6e811b43158 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -15442,6 +15442,9 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (!tr)
return -ENOMEM;
+ if (tgt_prog && tgt_prog->aux->tail_call_reachable)
+ tr->flags = BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX;
+
prog->aux->dst_trampoline = tr;
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
