From: Sarannya S <quic_sarannya@xxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 9bf2e9165f90dc9f416af53c902be7e33930f728 ] When a 'DEL_CLIENT' message is received from the remote, the corresponding server port gets deleted. A DEL_SERVER message is then announced for this server. As part of handling the subsequent DEL_SERVER message, the name- server attempts to delete the server port which results in a '-ENOENT' error. The return value from server_del() is then propagated back to qrtr_ns_worker, causing excessive error prints. To address this, return 0 from control_cmd_del_server() without checking the return value of server_del(), since the above scenario is not an error case and hence server_del() doesn't have any other error return value. Signed-off-by: Sarannya Sasikumar <quic_sarannya@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- net/qrtr/ns.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/qrtr/ns.c b/net/qrtr/ns.c index 3e40a1ba48f79..4a13b9f7abb44 100644 --- a/net/qrtr/ns.c +++ b/net/qrtr/ns.c @@ -569,7 +569,9 @@ static int ctrl_cmd_del_server(struct sockaddr_qrtr *from, if (!node) return -ENOENT; - return server_del(node, port, true); + server_del(node, port, true); + + return 0; } static int ctrl_cmd_new_lookup(struct sockaddr_qrtr *from, -- 2.43.0
