On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:46:32AM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> The commit 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child
> fwnode's consumer links") introduces the possibility to use the
> supplier's parent device instead of the supplier itself.
> In that case the supplier fwnode used is not updated and is no more
> consistent with the supplier device used.
>
> Use the fwnode consistent with the supplier device when checking flags.
>
> Fixes: 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child fwnode's consumer links")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes v2 -> v3:
> Do not update the supplier handle in order to keep the original handle
> for debug traces.
>
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> Remove sup_handle check and related pr_debug() call as sup_handle cannot be
> invalid if sup_dev is valid.
>
> drivers/base/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 4d8b315c48a1..440b52ec027f 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -2082,7 +2082,7 @@ static int fw_devlink_create_devlink(struct device *con,
> * supplier device indefinitely.
> */
> if (sup_dev->links.status == DL_DEV_NO_DRIVER &&
> - sup_handle->flags & FWNODE_FLAG_INITIALIZED) {
> + sup_dev->fwnode->flags & FWNODE_FLAG_INITIALIZED) {
> dev_dbg(con,
> "Not linking %pfwf - dev might never probe\n",
> sup_handle);
> --
> 2.41.0
>
Is this still needed? If so, how come no one is noticing it?
thanks,
greg k-h
